The initial industrial field trials validating this new geochemical prospecting method were succesfully conducred in 1991.

Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4 illustrate a case study of the technology applied to evaluate the hydrocarbon potential of seismic prospects within the platform zone of the Volga-Ural basin (Bashkortostan).

Survey Parameters:

    — Sampling Depth: 0.5 meters (subsurface soil layer)

    — Sampling Interval: 50-meter station spacing along the profile

    — Y-axis: Composite Oil-Bearing Indicator (OBI)

    — X-axis: Soil sampling stations along the profile crossing the seismic structures.

Soil sampling was carried out along profiles intersecting reference seismic targets with distinct well-proven drilling outcomes:

1. Hydrocarbon Reservoir Absent (Barren/Dry Structures):

     — Fig.1 — Eastern extension of the West-Rublevskaya structure.

     — Fig. 2 — Tazlarovskaya structure. 

2. Proven Productive Reservoir:

     — Fig. 3 — Karmyshevskoye oil field.

3. Blind Target Exploration  (Pre-Drilling Prediction):

     — Fig. 4 — Akkulayevskaya seismic prospect.



Структура не содержит нефть

Рт

Fig. 1  Dry structure

Структура не содержит нефть

Fig. 2. Dry structure

Структура нефтяная

Fig. 3. Confirmed oil-bearing structure

Структура нефтяная

Fig. 4. Confirmed by drilling

     Data Interpretation &Exploration Outcomes

     The  field data clearly demonstrate the high contrast and reliability of the technology:

    — Barren Prospects (Fig.1, 2): Above structures that lack hydrocarbon charge, the Oil-Bearing Indicator consistently remains within the baseline natural background range.

     — Proven Oil Field (Fig. 3): Above the crest and flanks of the productive structure, a powerful geochemical anomaly is detected,  with indicator values  exceeding the background baseline more than twofold. 

    — Exploration Target (Fig. 4): Above the unproven Akkulayevskaya seismic prospect, an abnormally high indicator response was detected on one of the structure’s flanks, suggesting a high-probability hydrocarbon charge.

    — Drilling Verification: Subsequent exploratory drilling fully confirmed the geochemical prediction — a commercial oil discovery was successfully made within the mapped structure.


     2016 Industrial Field Trials (Bashneft Oil Company Case Study).                                                            

In 2016, a comprehensive commercial field trial program was executed on the license blocks of PJSC «Bashneft» (Bakaly district, Republic of Bashkortostan) to evaluate the predictive power of the technology.

The project was conducted as a strict Blind Test mapping program. The survey matrix included:

·                     1 Reference Barren Prospect (Block No. 6) — for regional background calibration.

·                     3 Unproven Seismic Prospects (Blocks No. 1, No. 3, and No. 5) — with unknown hydrocarbon potential.

Field Logistics & Parameters:

·                     Sampling Method: Manual/portable auger sampling from the subsurface layer at a depth of 1 meter.

·                     Station Spacing: 100-meter interval between sampling points along the profile.

·                     Profile Extension: To capture accurate background baselines, profiles extended 500 meters beyond the mapped seismic boundaries on both entry and exit sides.

·                     Packaging: Collected soil (~100g) was stored in standard heavy-duty paper bags. No special preservation, airtight containers, or temperature-controlled transportation were required.

·                     Data Visualization: Y-axis: Composite Oil-Bearing Indicator (OBI). X-axis: Soil sampling stations across the prospect.

Полевые работы

     Exploration Outcomes & Data Analysis

    Block No. 6 (Reference Barren Target)

          — Data Response: The Oil-Bearing Indicator remained low and flat across the entire profile, never exceeding the baseline value of 0,4 units.

          — Pre-Drilling Prediction: Barren/Dry structure.

Структура не содержит нефть

   Block No. 1 (Unproven Prospect)

         — Prospect Size: 5,5 x 2,3 km.

      — Data response: The indicator values mirrored the background baseline, staying below 0,4 unites.

          — Pre-Drilling Prediction: Barren/Dry structure.  

Структура не содержит нефть

  Block No. 3 (Unproven prospect)

          — Prospect Size: 8 x 3 km.

          — Data Response: Stations 1 to 42 showed standard background levels. Stations 43 to 77 revealed a prominent anomaly, with indication values shifting 50% or more above the baseline.

    — Pre-Drilling Prediction: Partially Productive (hydrocarbon accumulation is constrained to the second half of the seismic structure).

Вторая половина структуры содержит нефть

Block No. 5 (Unproven Prospect)

         — Prospect Size: 2,5 x 1 km.

       — Data Response: The central segment of the profile exhibited a sharp, high-contrast peak, with indicator values exceeding the background baseline by approximately 200% (twofold). 

         — Pre-Drilling Prediction: Highly Productive/Oil-bearing structure.

Структура содержит нефть

   

     Following the analysis, an official pre-drilling hydrocarbon prediction report was submitted to the operator.  

   Drilling Verification & Official Endorsement

Drilling Outcomes: Subsequent exploratory drilling campaigns conducted by PJSC «Bashneft» fully confirmed our geochemical predictions with 100% accuracy across all surveyed blocks. The success of the project is formally documented in an official validation letter issued by the oil company’s management.